Originally posted on CBS Pittsburgh:

PITTSBURGH (KDKA) — Every day citizens are arrested and booked on suspicion of committing a crime — and their fingerprints are taken with or without their consent.

Now in a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court says police may take DNA samples, too, without a warrant.

“I think it is intrusive. I think it is a violation of the Fourth Amendment against improper search and seizure. I think it opens up the door,” Dr. Cyril Wecht told KDKA political editor Jon Delano on Monday.

[worldnow id=8954035 width=385 height=255 type=video]

The doctor-lawyer-forensic pathologist says taking a person’s DNA without their consent is a Pandora’s box, especially when that DNA is stored in government data banks long after a person has charges dismissed or is found innocent.

Wecht says don’t believe government officials when they say, “We’re only doing it for identification. We’re not doing it to determine whether or not you have…

View original 177 more words

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s